THINK ABOUTIT UFO SIGHTING REPORT
On the night of September 22, 2011, multiple witnesses in Louisiana observed a sophisticated display of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). The event involved approximately twelve luminous orbs—seven in a diagonal line and five in a triangular formation—that performed complex, shape-shifting maneuvers across the night sky. Classified as a Nocturnal Light (NL), the objects displayed intelligent flight patterns before vanishing, leaving witnesses in a state of amazement and confusion.
Date: September 22, 2011
Sighting Time: Approximately 8:00 PM – 9:00 PM
Day/Night: Night
Location: Louisiana
Urban or Rural: Urban
Hynek Classification: NL (Nocturnal Light) Point or extended luminous source observed at night.
Duration: 10–15 minutes
No. of Object(s): Multiple
Size of Object(s): Estimated 20–50 feet per orb
Distance to Object(s): Over 1,000 feet
Shape of Object(s): Round / Sphere
Color of Object(s): Yellow-Orange / Luminous White
Number of Witnesses: Multiple
Special Features: Shape Changing
Source: MUFON Case # 32079.
Summary: These blinking lights started moving all around each other.” The woman was able to get her boyfriend and others home at the time to come outside and witness the event. “The objects continue moving across the sky in different patterns until they were no longer visible. I also tried to capture this on my phone but nothing showed up but the night sky.”
Full Report
Orbs in diagonal line like 7 of them and 5 in a triangular form started moving all over making different shapes and eventually disappeared.
i had just pulled up to my boyfriends house and looked up to the night sky as I usually do because I love stars. I noticed something that looked like a star formation but I eventually realized it was moving. There was a diagonal line of blinking lights and in front of it was a shape. These blinking lights started moving all around each other. I called my boyfriend to come outside as soon as I realized this and eventually everyone from inside the house came outside to witness the crazy objects in the sky. My feelings were pure amazement but my boyfriend started to get freaked out. The objects continued moving across the sky in different patterns until they were no longer visible. I also tried to capture this on my phone but nothing showed up but the night sky. After I felt very confused but still amazed at what I saw.
Technical Comparison: 2011 Louisiana vs. 1997 Phoenix Lights
While the 2011 Louisiana sighting involves a smaller number of objects compared to the massive “V” shaped craft reported in Arizona, the two cases share several High-Strangeness technical signatures.
1. Geometric Precision and Formation Integrity
-
Phoenix Lights (1997): Witnesses reported a massive, solid triangular craft with lights that maintained a rigid formation, suggesting a single physical airframe.
-
Louisiana Orbs (2011): The seven-object diagonal and five-object triangle initially suggested a single craft, but the orbs’ ability to “move all around each other” indicates a coordinated swarm rather than a single solid object. This points toward independent units operating via a sophisticated “swarm intelligence” or a unified control network.
2. Visual vs. Digital Capture Discrepancies
-
Acoustic Signature: Both sightings were notably silent, ruling out conventional propulsion systems like jet turbines or rotors, which would be audible at the reported altitudes.
-
Sensor Anomalies: Just as the Louisiana witness found that nothing showed up on the phone camera despite seeing the lights clearly, many Phoenix witnesses reported that their home videos only captured grainy, distant lights that did not reflect the massive, star-blocking structure they saw with the naked eye. This technical anomaly suggests that these UAPs may emit light or energy in the Infrared (IR) spectrum, which is partially visible to the human eye but often filtered out by digital sensors.
3. Behavioral Reactions and The “Oz Effect”
-
Emotional Polarization: In both cases, witnesses experienced polarized reactions—ranging from pure amazement to being freaked out.
-
Localized Silence: Many reports of large-scale orb formations include a lack of ambient noise (crickets, wind, or traffic), a phenomenon known as the Oz Effect. The 2011 Louisiana report’s focus on the silent, “crazy objects” suggests a similar atmospheric damping effect often reported in high-credibility NL (Nocturnal Light) encounters.
Researchers Notes
-
Geometric Formations: The specific use of a 7-object diagonal and a 5-object triangle points toward a structured, possibly military-style coordination, though no known aircraft perform these specific “shape-changing” cluster maneuvers at night.
-
Failed Digital Capture: The inability of the phone camera to register the lights—despite the witness seeing them clearly—is a significant technical detail. This often suggests the orbs were emitting light in a spectrum (such as Infrared) that is visible to the human eye under certain conditions but filtered out by standard CMOS phone sensors.
-
Kinetic Behavior: The report that the lights were “moving all around each other” is a hallmark of High-Strangeness cases. It distinguishes the sighting from satellites or aircraft, which maintain a constant heading and speed.
-
Social Corroboration: Having multiple witnesses (the boyfriend and household members) strengthens the MUFON case data, as it rules out individual optical illusions or hallucinations.
The September 2011 Louisiana sighting stands out due to the high number of objects and their geometric precision. The primary witness initially mistook the lights for a standard star formation until the “stars” began to move in synchronized diagonal and triangular patterns. This behavior is characteristic of multi-object UAP clusters, where individual units appear to interact or communicate through formation changes. The witness attempted to document the event using a mobile device, but despite the visual clarity of the orbs to the naked eye, the camera failed to capture any light, a common technical anomaly in UFO photography often attributed to low-light sensor limitations or infrared emissions.
The emotional impact on the witnesses ranged from pure fascination to distress, with the witness’s boyfriend becoming “freaked out” by the non-conventional movement of the lights. These blinking orbs did not merely drift; they moved “all around each other,” suggesting a level of control that far exceeds tethered lanterns or high-altitude flares. By the time the objects disappeared, a group of people from the household had gathered to watch the event, providing multiple corroborating accounts for MUFON Case #32079.
